MMORPG or Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games. I think we "true" MMO fans know what I am talking about
You know, the "MMORPGS" that aren't really MMORPG's but rather games marked "MMOs" to get a piece of the World of Warcraft action. Countless games have been released post-WoW and always under the genre of "MMOs".
Which "MMOs" am I referring to you ask?
Well let's look at a list of games I can think of off my head first.
All Points Bulletin - APB
World of Warcraft - WOW
Star Wars: The Old Republic - SWTOR
Hellgate: London - HGL
Guild Wars - GW
Lineage 2 - L2
Ultima Online - UO
Champions Online - CO
City of Heroes -COX
Global Agenda - GA
Games like APB, Hellgate London, SWTOR, Global Agenda and Guild Wars (1 not 2) just to name ones I have played personally.
Games like these aren't "real" MMOs in my opinion mainly because there is very little that is "massive" about these games and usually no real role-playing elements in them (For the ones that include RPG at the end that is).
You will find that some of these games aren't labelled as MMO "RPGS" but rather MMO "FPS". I like to throw role-playing into the social department though which also makes up what an MMO"RPG" is.
Back on point!
The major things you would notice about some of these games is that the world isn't "restricted" or "guided" as other "MMOs" are. Basically, there is something "massive" about some of these game other than the amount of players subscribed to it for it.
Take World of Warcraft and Lineage 2 vs Star Wars: The Old Republic and Global Agenda for example .
When you play WoW it feels like a world. I can explore, even do things like running my low level from one side of the world to the other. Same goes with Lineage 2. If I don't like my questing area, I could leave and go to another area. It may take some time, but I have a "choice".
Now let's look at SWTOR.
I am restricted to one starting zone until I become level 10. Once I get to level 10, I go to the Republic Fleet , which is obviously encouraged as it has ALL the things you need ironically in an unending circle,(Which is a "hub".For those not sure what a "Hub" is, it's a place created specifically to get players to gather. It's similar to what World of Warcraft did with their Cataclysm expansion)and I can only go to ONE planet until I finish my class mission and get my ship (unless I join someone else on their ship).
Also, SWTOR is heavily instanced akin to APB, which doesn't promote a "massive" experience but rather persistent social hubs. Likewise with Global Agenda, after your first mission and few levels, you are sent to the "central" area where all of the things you need are there.
Games like SWTOR and Global Agenda...AREN'T MMOS. Period. They are "MO's", Multiplayer Online. I say this because once you start "instancing" everything outside of strategic content (usually done to prevent outside interference from completing a specific goal) the game usually is no longer an MMO.
Especially when it's done in the fashion that you can only have 100 or less players in each instance.
What makes it worse is that you don't even have a "choice" to make it a massive experience in games like Global Agenda, SWTOR and APB. They are dictated to you through FORCED instance placement once an area because "full".
So please, stop calling social hub instanced games "MMOs".
I know these developers call there games "MMOs" but the reality is they are not making anything "massive" other than hype.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Either that number is fabricated, based on something else or just not even close to that. And I don't believe anything that comes from EA because anyone not a game industry "noob" knows what EA is good for.
And it ain't customer support.
|WE DON'T LIE TO YOU!... UNLESS IT'S ABOUT DLC.|
I'm not seeing where these 1.7 million players are in SWTOR.
We have whole guilds that quit the game on my server and my guild makes up the majority of the Republic side active on now.
And most of us are leaving when GW 2 is out.
On top of that, I don't know anyone who either knows this game exist or plays it.
1.7 Million "Active" subscribers...doubt it...
James Ohlen said something a little bit ago about people "wanting SWTOR to fail"...Not only does it make it hard for me to take him serious when resorting to the average forum trolls taunts of "You're a hater" but I think he just really thinks...that SWTOR is something to be considered "creative".
Apparently, he is not looking at the same game I am.
The story is very repetitive. Even to the point where ALL the class stories are basically the same.
"Chase this person down. Stop this "super weapon."
So maybe I am a hater.
I hate shitty games obviously made with a lack of imagination and effort sheerly for profit.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Because she sure doesn't look like Ashley from Mass Effect 1 and 2...
Mass Effect 1
Mass Effect 2
Mass Effect 3...
Nice nose job and facial restructuring surgery there!
And apparently, new eyes!
As I struggle through to enjoy SWTOR , I just can't help but wonder if I am being too picky or perhaps just jaded from all the other "Let's get rich quick!" MMO schemes that have been run into the ground post 2004.
Many things bother me about how this game is designed...however, there are just somethings in this game which I can't understand how it was even thought of as a "good idea".
The main aspect and reason "MMORPG" fans play them is to play with others. At least that's what I think!...
Basically, being social.
Even this game is about that... but done completely wrong.
Being "social" in this game is as artifical as it gets. It's not really being "social" when you have to reward players or lure them with bait just to communicate/play with other players.
Social in SWTOR means grind in SWTOR.
|A "Social" Life That Is!|
I used to loathe people spamming general chat but I feel I'd rather see that now then no one saying anything at all other than "LFG HAMMER STATION" and NPC chat spam.
In fact, in game, there is no real community to be "social" with to begin with. And don't even get me started on the polarized forum community...
Back on point...social is a grind.
And that is mainly because being "social" has rewards that are given as an incentive to get people to group because I feel they [Bioware] knew there wouldn't be a desire for player to want to play with others. Not only is it a grind. It's a tedious boring grind. Even worse when you have to sit through dialogue you have heard 10 million times because one person in your group hasn't. Especially those who only came for "story".
Not only was the "social" system a bad idea, it was created in lackluster fashion. As it stands now, people just grind Esseles over and over. You know why I think that is?
Because most people that play this game didn't group for every single mission they had when they started the game. Gasp. Just like in other MMOs, most people will solo what they can and group when needed. And it didn't really help that the social points aren't even rewarding decent amounts of points.
Also, who really wants to go through all of that again on an alt?